Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
One Man’s Reading List One Man’s Reading List

One Man’s Reading List

Calum Anderson offers his “great” alternatives to what he considers the weak fare pushed by too many universities. Do Convivium readers agree? We’d love to see your alternative reading lists. Send them to convivium@cardus.ca.

Calum Anderson
6 minute read

When I was in teacher’s college my first English Curriculum class was spent playing “four corners,” a children's game which is often played in elementary schools. (The fact it was played in a second-entry program at a major Canadian university is telling). Our instructor asked us to read the signs posted in each of the four corners of the classroom and to stand in the corner that best aligned with our thinking on why certain books should be studied. 

I was one of two students standing in the “Great Books” corner. Ninety-six per cent of my colleagues were in the “diversity” corner. The exercise demonstrated the limits on diversity of in our universities. Students who hold traditional, conservative or religious values are often in corners by themselves. Progressivist education weds itself to identity politics and critical theory. Students have not been taught to recognize how they have been deprived of the most essential components of moral and intellectual development: great books. Here are five books I recommend to start reversing that deficiency.

Up from Slavery by Booker T. Washington

Booker T. Washington was born in Virginia in 1856, seven years before the Emancipation Proclamation. Although he was born into slavery, Washington lived most of his life as a “free” man and became a successful educator, author and orator. Up from Slavery is a testament to self-reliance in the face of hardship and discrimination. Washington’s resiliency is best captured in a childhood anecdote where he describes how he quit his job at a coal mine and walked 500 miles for a chance to attend the Hampton Institute, a private school in Virginia for black children who could work in lieu of paying tuition. When he reached the Institute, Washington was tired and filthy from his travels. The head-teacher looked at him in disgust. After several hours of waiting, she demanded that Washington sweep out the school’s recitation room. “Never did I receive an order with more delight,” Washington recollects, understanding the order to be an opportunity. Washington could have easily taken offence at the head teacher’s request. His dishevelled appearance was an outward sign of drive and determination, but he was being treated like a servant. Nonetheless, he scoured the recitation room and exceeded the head teacher’s expectations. The challenge was indeed an opportunity. He was admitted to Hampton on the spot and went on to found Tuskegee University, one of the first African American institutions in Alabama.  

Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can’t Stop Talking by Susan Cain

As an introvert, I used to find seminars extremely challenging. I believed that introversion was a character flaw, and I deeply envied my extroverted peers who didn’t seem to worry about speaking in front of a group. It wasn’t until I read Susan Cain’s Quiet that I began to view introversion as a strength. Cain, an American attorney and Harvard graduate, examines the way in which Western societies champion extroversion as the ideal personality. This is obvious when you consider our education system’s incessant promotion of group work, collaboration, and “putting yourself out there.” Collaboration certainly is important, but so too is solitary reflection. Cain uses the 2008 financial crisis as a case study, and notes that many Wall Street financiers who predicted the crash were introverts whose thoughtful considerations and warnings were drowned out by gregarious brokers who confidently assured stakeholders that everything would be fine. One of my history professors once gave me an excellent piece of advice that is echoed in Cain’s book: When quiet people find their voice, they discover they have very interesting things to say. Cain dissuades introverts from faking it. You don’t need to pretend to be an extrovert, she argues, because introverts can offer unique perspectives and insights. They also have a responsibility to make themselves heard. If they don’t, those perspectives and insights will be muffled “in a world that can’t stop talking.”    

Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl

After spending three years in Auschwitz, the psychologist Viktor Frankl reached the surprising conclusion that life is meaningful. Frankl understood that man should not “ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather must recognize that it is he who is asked.” It is difficult to imagine a more soul-deadening atmosphere than a Nazi death camp, yet some university students appear to be addled with a sense of hopelessness which even Frankl was not. Is this hopelessness not justified? Isn’t our society corrupt? Isn’t our planet is dying? Isn’t it true that nothing you do will matter one-thousand years from now? Frankl’s memoir Man’s Search for Meaning leaves one with a different impression. It is nearly impossible to feel anything but gratitude for one’s own circumstances after contemplating his vivid descriptions of the Holocaust. Frankl developed logotherapy, which is founded on the premise that humans are primary motivated by a search for meaning. Frankl’s contemporary Sigmund Freud argued that the unconscious mind governs our behaviours and is profoundly influenced by repressed sexual desires. Logotherapy is more satisfying than Freud’s theory, however. Death camp inmates were starving and emaciated; their bodies had lost the ability feel and act upon sexual impulses. Even in this state, however, some men and women were possessed by an unwavering will to survive. They were not motivated by sex, but by the understanding that suffering did not render their lives meaningless. They could find meaning through suffering with humility and dignity. 

The Coddling of the American Mind by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt

In The Coddling of the American Mind, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt link climbing rates of anxiety, depression, and suicide among university students to three “great untruths” that contravene modern psychology and ancient wisdom:

  • The Untruth of Fragility: What doesn’t kill you makes you weaker. This harms students because it teaches them that unfamiliar, uncomfortable, or offensive ideas put them in physical as well as emotional danger. Instead of confronting challenges, students are encouraged to hide from them. Much like the human immune system, however, students must be exposed to challenges and stressors if they are to mature. Our culture of “safetyism” counterproductively defines students as fragile.   
  • The Untruth of Emotional Reasoning: Always trust your feelings. This idea is harmful because it teaches students to embrace “cognitive distortions” such as “negative filtering” (an oppressive form of pessimism), or “catastrophizing” (focusing on the worst possible outcome). When students give into these distortions, they are more likely to interpret others’ opinions uncharitably, and are reluctant to engage in mature and professional discourse.  
  • The Untruth of Us Versus Them: Life is a battle between good people and evil people. Lukianoff and Haidt examine two different kinds of identity politics: common-humanity identity politics, and common-enemy identity politics. The former was practiced by Martin Luther King Jr. who humanized his opponents by referring to them as brothers and sisters. He then appealed to their humanity instead of demonizing or shaming them. It’s the opposite of appealing to members of an ethnic group by uniting them against a shared foe.

Explaining Postmodernism by Stephen R.C. Hicks    

As a first-year student I was offered membership to Trent University’s Marxist Society. I was nearly seduced by the brochure which promised me an equitable utopia and comradery. But when I began my studies and learned about 20th century history, I questioned why any student would want to join a Marxist club. Why do educated people embrace such a dangerous ideology? Philosopher Stephen Hicks offers a possible explanation in Explaining Postmodernism. Hicks lays out the intellectual history of postmodernism, a philosophy that has become incredibly influential in the humanities and social sciences. He describes postmodernism as the academic far-left’s epistemological response to the failure of communism. A favourite postmodern talking point is the dichotomous conception of our world as embroiled in a power struggle between groups of historically “oppressed” people and their historical “oppressors.” Hicks elegantly describes how this is a repackaged brand of Marx’s “class conflict” theory wherein the monetary variable is substituted with a racial one. He notes that influential postmodernists such as Michel Foucault were ardent Maoists during the Cultural Revolution. Interestingly, during his tenure as dictator, Mao waged war against the “four olds”: Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas – does that sound familiar?

Convivium publishes texts that do not necessarily reflect the views held by Cardus, the Convivium team, or its editors. In the spirit of discussion, dialogue, and debate, we ask readers to bear in mind that publication does not equal endorsement. Thanks for reading. Join the conversation!

You'll also enjoy...

Who is Responsible for College Seniors?

Who is Responsible for College Seniors?

If high schools are judged by their college acceptances, why are colleges not judged and ranked by their ability to launch their graduates into meaningful careers within their callings? The academic culture of a college cohort—whether students freely engage in discussions about ideas outside of clas...

100 Years of Fortitude

100 Years of Fortitude

Convivium's editor in chief Father Raymond J. de Souza marks the anniversary of both the Sacred Heart of Mary parish and Queen's University's "Newman Club." 

What Brent McCamon Said

What Brent McCamon Said

In late March, Ottawa writer and researcher Brent McCamon wrote sceptically on Convivium.ca about protestors who tried to prevent University of Toronto Professor Jordan Peterson from speaking at the National Gallery of Canada. The activists wanted Peterson “de-platformed” because of his opposition to State-mandated use of transgender positive pronouns. McCamon, in “Wherefore Art Thou Peterson,” argued the academic advent of so-called “intersectionality theory” is spreading incoherence outward from Canadian university campuses. Readers embraced the dialectic – if not the binary - in their responses.