×
Convivium was a project of Cardus 2011‑2022, and is preserved here for archival purposes.
Search
Search
Lance Armstrong's Increasingly Popular WorldLance Armstrong's Increasingly Popular World

Lance Armstrong's Increasingly Popular World

First, Mr. Armstrong's sins were confessed to Oprah, who next to the Kennedys is pretty much the closest thing to royalty that America can find to fill the 237-year-old void it still seems to feel when it comes to monarchy. But there's more: Oprah is now a quasi-religious cultural construct, having assumed the roles of She To Whom One's Sins Are Confessed and She From Whom Forgiveness and Absolution are Sought.

Peter Menzies
2 minute read

The recent confession of cycling icon Lance Armstrong to a life built on lies, deception, and seven doping-enabled Tour de France victories is notable both for its format and the public's response.

First, Mr. Armstrong's sins were confessed to Oprah, who next to the Kennedys is pretty much the closest thing to royalty that America can find to fill the 237-year-old void it still seems to feel when it comes to monarchy. But there's more: Oprah is now a quasi-religious cultural construct, having assumed the roles of She To Whom One's Sins Are Confessed and She From Whom Forgiveness and Absolution are Sought. Indeed, Calgary is all abuzz because it will be the city in which Oprah (who, like Pele, no longer has need of a surname) first publicly appears follow her meeting with The Great Cheater.

People will hang on every word, wondering what she thinks. Did she find him sincere? Should we forgive him? If so, when and after what form of penance? It is as if all the eyes in the Coliseum have turned towards the Empress, wondering if the thumb will turn up or will it turn down?

More, these public floggings of overly ambitious athletes have become increasingly alarming for the sorts of discussions there are producing. Here, for instance, is the latest question I heard posed regarding the Armstrong file: Is it really cheating if everyone else is doing it?

The answer is simple if you live in a world of objective truth: Yes, it is. If it is against the rules, it is cheating. We may wish, theologically or legally, to collectively debate the rules and their interpretation but once they are rules they are rules. But if you live in the increasingly popular world of hyper-individualistic moral relativism, a world in which "no one has the right to judge me or be the boss of me," where your self-esteem is the prime purpose of life? Then the answer is, like everything else in that world, maybe. Because, it's, ya know, like, all the other guys in the locker room are taking something, so it's not like I'm doing anything wrong, I'm just asking for a level playing field. Once you allow what is acceptable to be defined solely by what is common practice, pretty much anything becomes possible.

Interestingly, this extends to the rest of us who compete in life beyond the celebrity light that shines upon the likes of Lance Armstrong. We compete for love, friends, prestige, power, influence, the primacy of our ideas, and money both in our personal and professional lives. The halls of corporate offices are, those who have worked within them can attest, a virtual battlefield. How do we conduct ourselves in these competitions? Are there rules? Do we follow them or do we cheat? And, if everyone else is doing it and the rules are only defined by the lowest common denominator, is it cheating?

Is Lance Armstrong any more a cheater (set the lies aside for a moment) than Cristiano Ronaldo is when the Real Madrid star takes a flop to earn a penalty kick like all the other strikers do and wins a famous sporting victory?

Is the employee who finally caves to peer pressure and mails it in because "everyone else is doing it" any less of a cheater? Or the job promotion candidate who casually undermines a rival with eyebrows and muttered questions about supposed personal life choices or imaginary drinking habits?

How we answer these questions, assuming we retain the ability to ask them, will shape the world in which we live. Ideas matter.

Topics: Justice

Peter Menzies

Peter Menzies is past CRTC vice chair of Telecom, a past publisher of the Calgary Herald and is a National Newspaper Award-winning journalist. He also advises tech companies but his views are always his own.

You'll also enjoy...

What Else Lives to 100?

What Else Lives to 100?

This, after all, is an event that was started up by an entrepreneur, Guy Weadick, in order to honour the conclusion of the open range way of life that pretty much ended in 1905 when Alberta became a province and, as they say, "the barbed wire went up ...

What Lies Beneath Public Discourse

What Lies Beneath Public Discourse

Water treatment plants might not be about heaven and hell, but all political discourse—on hijabs or highways—plumbs the depths of human life ...

Ralph Klein and the Commonfolk

Ralph Klein and the Commonfolk

So when dementia began to influence him a couple of years into his post-Premier life he would stand, hesitantly and most of the time alone at the fringes of public functions in rooms where no one remotely resembling Martha or Henry could be found Many words have and will continue to be written about...