×
All Hail the TwitteratiAll Hail the Twitterati

All Hail the Twitterati

But is it true, like Alexis Wichowski has argued, that social media is now so central to good governance, to political and social life, that "to ignore or disdain it would amount to professional malpractice?"

Robert Joustra
2 minute read
Like Convivium? , our free weekly email newsletter.

The twitterati are now an established class of pundits. Journalists and politicians are increasingly known for their 140-characters of sass, more so even than their editorials or full press releases. The Canadian International Council has launched a new annual roundup of the most influential Canadian foreign policy tweeters (#cdnfp), and magazines like Foreign Affairs and Foreign Policy swell with sassy twitterati RT'ing the latest story, insight, or Game of Thrones meme.

But is it true, like Alexis Wichowski has argued, that social media is now so central to good governance, to political and social life, that "to ignore or disdain it would amount to professional malpractice?"

Wichowski's argument is about diplomacy, a touchy profession if ever there was one for hashtags and sass. Still, says Wichowski, despite a growing canon of errors that embassies, diplomats, and politicians have indeed made, tweeting remains one of the best communication, marketing, and interaction tools in a foreign service worker's toolbox. Yes, there was that tweet last September from the American Embassy in Cairo that got a senior public affairs officer recalled to Washington that same night. But there was also the Canadian ambassador to China, David Mulroney, tweeting out pictures of his official car—an old Toyota Camry—that took Chinese twitter (Weibo) by storm, for the plain and unadorned style of a high ranking Western ambassador. It showed something personal, but something important, about what it meant to be an ambassador for Canada.

Hillary Clinton made social media part of her 21st Century Statecraft initiative, memorialized now in the community-generated, bladder-bursting bombasity of TextsfromHillary. Diplomats were not only permitted but actively encouraged to tweet. Wichowski argues that despite the risks, this has largely been a success. Professionals with media training and communications savvy know that tweets are not the sort of thing one blithely taps out at the grocery. Most tweets are general information, condensed links to official statements, reminders or announcements of policies for which full text exists elsewhere. But the greatest twitterati can turn the mundane exercise of 'live tweeting' political moments, which are often far too banal to cover unironically, into witty, personalized exchanges. Institutions—like embassies, universities, think tanks, etc—can't really have personalities, but their people probably should. Loyalty and commitment, after all, are usually not carried by institutes, but by persons, to persons.

If it's true for diplomats, who have perilously sensitive things to safeguard and communicate, it's probably true for other institutions too. Twitter is condescended for its brevity, but the character limit is its genius, forcing tweeters to economize, not sermonize, to cut to the point, often with the implicit irony that total justice cannot be done to a topic or person in the space. But that's the point: twitter is a proximate-opinion-ticker that leaks the personality that press releases and official statements often prevent.

The best diplomacy, said George Kennan, is the one that involves the fewest, not the most, secrets. Same should be said for leadership; same should be said for relationships. Too many institutions, too many offices, have been too long faceless, stoic, official, secretive about who they are, what they're on about. Twitter gifts personality to diplomats, leaders, opinion makers; it discloses, rather than obscures. Personality and relationship are what the faceless, mass scale institutions of modern life so badly need. Maybe it's not just diplomats disdaining twitter that are guilty of professional malpractice.

You'll also enjoy...

Draw the Shades on the Fishbowl

Draw the Shades on the Fishbowl

Yes, we live in a constitutional democracy in which the public interest, rather than private interest of those in government, takes precedent ...

Mathematics and social architecture?

Mathematics and social architecture?

So what kind of rigour do we apply when we talk about social architecture? Are mathematics of use? What kind? What are the limits? What might we gain? Should we save the analytic work for the built environment and adopt something different for the human social factors? Many social science tools have...

Some corrections from last week

Some corrections from last week

It takes uncharacteristic idealism, maybe even huge naïveté, to suggest that slow justice rather than fast revolution can fix anything; that the system, the people, can survive slow repair or even that there is enough redeemable in it to justify the enormous patience of reform Power just spent the l...

Join Convivium

Convivium means living together. Unlike many digital magazines, we haven’t put up a digital paywall. We want to keep the conversation regarding faith in our common and public life as open as possible.

Get a weekly wrap up of the latest articles delivered right to your inbox.